Mj. Brisco et al., Comparison of methods for assessment of minimal residual disease in childhood B-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia, LEUKEMIA, 15(3), 2001, pp. 385-390
The level of minimal residual disease (MRD) early in treatment of acute lym
phoblastic leukemia (ALL) strongly predicts the risk of marrow relapse. As
a variety of methods of varying complexity have been separately used for de
tecting and quantifying MRD, we compared the prognostic utility of three me
thods measurement of blast percentage on day 14 of treatment, detection of
monoclonality on day 14 or day 35, and measurement of MRD by PCR-based limi
ting dilution analysis on day 14 or day 35, The study group comprised 38 ch
ildren aged 1-15 with Philadelphia-negative B-lineage ALL who were uniforml
y treated and followed until relapse or for a minimum of 5 years. We also s
tudied some of the technical factors which influence the ability to detect
MRD, Measurement of blast percentage on day 14 by an expert morphologist, d
etection of monoclonality on day 35, and PCR-based measurement of MRD level
s on days 14 and 35 all showed significant ability to divide patients into
prognostic groups. Measurement of blast percentage on day 14 by routine mor
phology or detection of monoclonality on day 14 were not useful. The qualit
y of DNA samples varied greatly, as determined by amplifiability in the PCR
, However, virtually all amplifiable leukemic targets in a sample were dete
ctable which suggests that the level of detection achieved by limiting dilu
tion analysis is essentially determined by the amount of DNA which it is pr
acticable to study. We conclude that quantification of MRD at the end of in
duction provides the full range of prognostic information for marrow relaps
e but is complex; detection of monoclonality on day 35 is simple and has go
od positive predictive value; and quantification of MRD on day 14 merits fu
rther study. PCR-based methods for measurement of MRD levels should incorpo
rate a correction for variation in DNA amplifiability.