First clinical experience with the automatic positioning system and Leksell gamma knife Model C - Technical note

Citation
Ga. Horstmann et al., First clinical experience with the automatic positioning system and Leksell gamma knife Model C - Technical note, J NEUROSURG, 93, 2000, pp. 193-197
Citations number
4
Language
INGLESE
art.tipo
Article
Categorie Soggetti
Neurology,"Neurosciences & Behavoir
Journal title
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY
ISSN journal
0022-3085 → ACNP
Volume
93
Year of publication
2000
Supplement
3
Pages
193 - 197
Database
ISI
SICI code
0022-3085(200012)93:<193:FCEWTA>2.0.ZU;2-A
Abstract
In May of 1999, the first Leksell Model C gamma knife was installed at the Gamma Knife Zentrum in Krefeld, Germany. The authors recount their experien ce with this latest technical gamma knife development. Until the end of 1999, extensive physical and technical tests were performe d and the system's hardware and software were continuously improved and ada pted to the user's needs. By the end of 1999, 163 GKSs had been performed u sing the new functionality of the Model C in manual or "trunnion" mode. The trunnions, the two parts of the system that fix the patient headframe to t he gamma knife when the isocenter positions, are checked manually. During the same period the new automatic positioning system (APS) was exten sively tested and refined so that the first APS treatment could be performe d in January 2000. Fifty GKSs have been performed with the APS capability o f the Model C. It was possible to use APS alone in 74% of surgeries whereas in 14% someshots were given with APS and some with trunnions. In 12%, GKS was scheduled and planned for APS, but due to unexpected technical (6%) or mechanical (6%) reasons the treatment had to be performed manually. At present there are some spatial restrictions with Model C in APS mode whe n compared with the Model B. The most significant restriction is the narrow space for the patient's shoulders, especially when deep-seated lesions are treated. Through mechanical changes of the APS motor housing and some modi fications of and to the motor driven couch adjustment, these limitations wi ll be reduced in the future. The APS treatment runs smoothly and fast. In no case did any relevant safet y error occur during GKS. The more stringent mechanical limitations of the APS compared with the Model B means that frame placement on the head is mor e critical than before.