Treatment of patients with systemic sclerosis with extracorporeal photochemotherapy (photopheresis)

Citation
Dnh. Enomoto et al., Treatment of patients with systemic sclerosis with extracorporeal photochemotherapy (photopheresis), J AM ACAD D, 41(6), 1999, pp. 915-922
Citations number
57
Language
INGLESE
art.tipo
Article
Categorie Soggetti
Dermatology,"da verificare
Journal title
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY
ISSN journal
0190-9622 → ACNP
Volume
41
Issue
6
Year of publication
1999
Pages
915 - 922
Database
ISI
SICI code
0190-9622(199912)41:6<915:TOPWSS>2.0.ZU;2-F
Abstract
Background: Effective treatment modalities for systemic sclerosis, a life-t hreatening and disabling disease, are still lacking. Possible efficacy of p hotopheresis has been reported in several studies. Because of the complexit y of the treatment, placebo-controlled trials are difficult to perform. Objective: We investigated the effect of photopheresis on clinical paramete rs (skin score and internal organ functions), immunologic parameters, and q uality of life. Methods: Nineteen patients with progressive systemic sclerosis of less than 5 years' duration were randomized into 2 groups. One group (group A) recei ved photopheresis for 1 pear, the other group (group B) received no treatme nt at all. After 1 year the groups switched (crossover design). Photopheres is was performed on 2 consecutive days every 4 weeks; the psoralens were ad ministered parenterally. The main outcome parameter was the skin score afte r 1 year of treatment compared with that of the control group. Results: The average skin score improved with 5.4% (standard error [SE], 20 .8%) in group A and deteriorated with 4.5% (SE, 13.8%) in group B (not sign ificant; P = .71). Before crossover, the average increase in skin score was 5.3% (means of entire group). No change was observed in other clinical par ameters. Approximately 1 year after crossover, the skin score reversed to w hat would have been expected with an average increase of 5.3% per year. The re was also no effect on immunologic parameters. Quality of life did not ch ange during treatment. Conclusion: We were not able to show that photopheresis, performed as descr ibed above, is an effective treatment in systemic sclerosis. The difference in average skin score was statistically and clinically insignificant. Desp ite the small sample size, we concluded that the magnitude of the observed changes is too small to justify photopheresis as a regular treatment.