c-erbB-2 oncoprotein, CEA, and CA15.3 in patients with breast cancer: prognostic value

Citation
R. Molina et al., c-erbB-2 oncoprotein, CEA, and CA15.3 in patients with breast cancer: prognostic value, BREAST CANC, 51(2), 1998, pp. 109-119
Citations number
28
Language
INGLESE
art.tipo
Article
Categorie Soggetti
Oncology,"Onconogenesis & Cancer Research
Journal title
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT
ISSN journal
0167-6806 → ACNP
Volume
51
Issue
2
Year of publication
1998
Pages
109 - 119
Database
ISI
SICI code
0167-6806(199809)51:2<109:COCACI>2.0.ZU;2-S
Abstract
The diagnostic value of a new tumor marker, c-erbB-2, was studied in the se ra of 50 healthy subjects, 58 patients with benign breast diseases, and 413 patients with breast cancer (186 locoregional, 185 with advanced disease, and 42 with no evidence of disease). Using 15 U/ml as the cut-off, no healt hy subjects or patients with benign diseases and only 2.4% of no evidence o f disease patients had elevated serum levels. Abnormal c-erbB-2 levels were found in 29% (101/370) of the patients with breast carcinoma (locoregional 9%, metastases 45.4%). CEA (cut-off 5 U/ml) and CA 15.3 (cut-off 35 U/ml) sensitivity was 18% and 16% in patients with locoregional disease and 61% a nd 70% in those patients with advanced disease, respectively. A trend towar d higher serum levels of all three tumor markers in patients with nodal inv olvement or greater tumor size was found, but was statistically significant only with CEA (p < 0.01). By contrast, c-erbB-2 was related to steroid rec eptors, in both locoregional and metastatic tumors. When the prognostic val ue of these markers was evaluated, patients with abnormally high presurgica l CEA and c-erbB-2 had a worse prognosis than those patients with normal va lues, in both node-negative (p < 0.05 and p < 0.001, respectively) and node -positive patients (p < 0.556 and p < 0.001. respectively). By contrast, no relationship was found between CA 15.3 values and prognosis. Multivariate analysis showed that CEA and c-erbB-2 were also prognostic factors. The cor relation between serum and tissue levels of c-erbB-2 was studied in the tum ors of 161 patients. Significantly higher c-erbB-2 serum levels were found in patients with overexpression in tissue by immunohistochemistry, in both locoregional and advanced disease (p = 0.0001). Serum concentrations in pat ients with advanced disease were related to the site of recurrence, with si gnificantly higher values in patients with metastases (mainly in those with liver metastases) than in those with locoregional recurrence. In summary, c-erbB-2 serum levels seem to be a useful tumor marker in the prognosis of patients with breast cancer. Using all three tumor markers, sensitivity was 35% in patients with locoregional breast cancer and 88% in patients with r ecurrence.